The biggest (in)SECT in the world

hell-oooooooooow...

Nice to meet U!

My name is "Mushe" or "Muha"-MAD!




God's consciousness - wake up!!....
...and see how the ignorance swallows the world like a giant python








This sect is not satisfied ONLY with an insect, but - with sth far a lot bigger!








What happened to Polaris(Dhruva), the abode of Vishnu(Aryan God)?









...later on... the Talmudic Khazars- "Ashkenazi" introduced themselves as "mentality inventors" and 'Europe-cultivators', 'bringers of European civilization' as 'Homo-sapiens Evolution':




Gypsies(Outcastes)"tamed" it and made dance after their ignorance-"TAMAS dance":

















"In "Flame of the Gods,' '

Mr. Moffett makes two statements I would like follow-through upon. He says that the 'monkey' people of the Ramayana are better defined than the 'bear' people in this text. I would like to know just how. Then when he talks of neanderthaloids and Homo sapiens fossilis he states there is evidence of their interbreeding, yet does not give specifics. It is an insistence of the scientific community that such never happened, yet he states such has. On what grounds does he make this hypothesis?


The reference to the "monkey" and "bear" people in the Ramayana simply reflected a straightforward reading of the English translation of the Ramayan(during Treta Yuga ) of Valmiki made by R. T. H. Griffith, Principal of Benares College, in 1874. The two leading generals of the "monkeys" or Vanar(a) -- Hanuman and Sugriva -- are named there and both play prominent roles in Rama's war against Ravana, the Vanar legions themselves figuring more prominently than do the "bear" legions in alliance with Rama. In fact, in the epic no "bear" is singled out by name, and the "bear" legions appear only relatively anonymously and in second place to the "monkeys." In addition, Rama asks his friend Hanuman to find Sita, his wife, who had disappeared. The loyal Hanuman, at great risk to his own life, and after many adventures testing his courage and intelligence, at last finds Sita who has been kidnapped by Ravana through a trick and taken to his stronghold on the island(sunken continent) of Lanka, headquarters of the Rakshasa host.

Inasmuch as the "bears" are depicted as having the same distinctively human qualities as assigned to the "monkeys" in the epic, I think we are justified in concluding that they, too, were some sort of hominid and not a mere animal species such as the bears today. It would have been helpful if the epic had better delineated the "bears," for then we could more accurately analyze if and where they might figure among early hominids! By getting and reading a good translation of this marvelous Indian record of prehistory -- as I think it is -- one can decide for oneself how he or she would characterize the "bear" people.






The novel "Planet of the apes" is a mock of "Ramayana", but through the prism of th author- a French catholic-agnostic. Here the personages general URko and general URsus are unambiguous.